一个马来西亚

“一个马来西亚”是什么意思？

哲学家会说：“这是一个十分有深度的，因为它简单得又不容易明白。”

天文学家会说：“在浩瀚的宇宙，有一个太阳系，太阳系里有一个地球，地球上有一个马来西亚。”

生物学家会说：“虽然我们可以复制羊，牛，甚至人，我们不能多复制一个马来西亚。”

地理学家会说：“一个马来西亚，是在一个新加坡的北部，也是在一个泰国的南部。”

数学家会说：“对了，一个马来西亚，就是一个马来西亚，不可能会是两个”

国阵马屁精会说：“你看不出是什么吧？这就证明首相有远见。”

马来西亚百姓：“？？？”

自从首相就任，提出“一个马来西亚”口号，至今还只是一个口号。首相7月31日刚推出的“一个马来西亚”信托基金，依旧有种族固打。这是很大的讽刺，难道首相要塑造一个到处有固打制的马来西亚？要人民了解什么是“一个马来西亚”的施政方针，言行一致是必须的，单单口号是不够的。

赵明福事件已经把国阵的反贪假面具扯了下来。原来反贪污局所谓积极调查巴生港口和基尔的2,400万的豪宅是假的，怎样都不会查国阵官员像查问赵明福到三更半夜吧？与赵明福同一天被召问话的加影市议员陈文华被反贪污官员以暴力，恐吓及种族性言论辱骂。很有可能对赵明福的盘问方式也是如此。陈文华被辱骂为“一个愚蠢华人”。如果这是所谓“一个马来西亚”的施政方针，那么这口号应该改为“一个黑色马来西亚”更为恰当。

贪污是众多施政偏差的根源。新首相政府仍然没有展示扑灭贪污的决心。砂州国阵方面更是照一贯的作风，官官相护，一起“发财”。砂州政府没有实施所有政府工程公开投标的决心，继续黑箱作业，又是“一个黑色马来西亚”。

再来，根据2009年反贪污委员会法令第23条文阐明，“任何公共机构的官员，利用自己的职位或地位，获取任何利益给予自己，或亲属或朋党，都属于贪污。”如果这些作风没有铲除，也是“一个黑色马来西亚”的局面。

“一个马来西亚”到底是什么意思，至今还没有解释清楚。

当局越欺压，越多人向我们登记选民

　　诗华日报报导

行动党破纪录　美食节130选民注册

(本报古晋11日讯)砂行动党极力为市民提供“新选民登记”之服务﹐并在上周六在古晋美食节突破记录﹐收集了130份选民登记资料。
　　砂行动党国州议员张健仁之特别助理黄庆伟于今午的媒体发布会上表示﹐该党于8月8日晚上，在古晋民众会堂为市民处理选民登记﹐但却遭南市执法部向他发出一张传票﹐罪名指他在没有向市议会申请准证的情况下﹐在古晋民众会堂范围里展示“新选民登记”的告示牌﹐因而罚款马币200令吉。
　　传票内也显示﹐受罚者必需在期限内﹐即8月17日缴清有关罚款。
　　他补充﹐此项条例是根据南市(广告)条例2003年第3条文﹐若受罚者不缴交罚款，将把问题带上法庭﹐罚款最高为2000令吉或监禁6个月。
　　黄庆伟诉说当晚的情况时指出﹐当行动党党员在民众会堂进行新选民登记时﹐大约有10多名南市执法部队站立在旁约有30分钟﹐之后﹐才要求该党收起告示牌﹐否则将触犯南市的条例。

执法部队有心针对

　　他表示﹐从南市执法部队的举动可看出﹐该些官员是存心针对行动党﹐因为他们是在新选民登记处徘徊了许久后﹐才想到援引何种法令来对付行动党。
　　“而且有关南市执法部的领队，除了要求我们收起新选民登记告示外﹐还警告我，不要占他们(南市)的便宜。当时﹐我并不清楚﹐我们占了南市什么便宜？我们只是为市民进行选民登记。”
　　黄庆伟也说﹐南市于上周阻止行动党在民众会堂摆设摊口﹐而开出传单予张健仁﹐所以该党改用以举牌方式﹐但却又处处遭到阻扰。但是﹐他清楚知道的是﹐砂州国阵政府一直透过地方议会来占人民的便宜。
　　他举例说明﹐垃圾私营化就是一项很明显的例子。他续说﹐以前﹐地方议会每年只需花费50万令吉作为垃圾回收费用﹐但自垃圾私营化后﹐南市单缴付给私营化公司的开销﹐每年大约300万令吉。不仅如此﹐垃圾回收的次数不但减少﹐服务态度也变差。
　　他表示﹐缴交传单会让他心有不甘﹐在这情况下﹐他将会与该党领袖﹐以及行动党律师团成员商讨此事﹐以作出解决方案。
　　“目前﹐我未做任何决定﹐而且缴付罚款的期限也还没到。”

War over Voters Registration

From Sarawak Update

MBKS and DAP war over voters registration counter continues

Wong King Wei, Personal Assistant to MP for Kuching, Chong Chieng Jen received a summon last Saturday night from the Kuching city south for ‘exhibit depiting new voters registration without valid licence/permit from the council.
Wong said this afternoon that he was disappointed with the council’s enforcement unit’s attitude as before giving him the summon, they had stood around for half an hour deciding what to do with him and the DAP members for helping registering young voters.
The enforcement head of MBKS said, “Dont take advantage of us” before giving the summon. He said it appeared that the MBKS were adament on giving them a hard time.
Wong said it was the MBKS who had been taking advantage of the people all these while. He said before the rubbish collection was privatised, the council coolection was RM500,000 per year. After Trienken took over, he said, collection of rubbish which was only 2 times per week(previously 3 times), the payment was RM3 million per year.
He said the week before Chong also received a summon for littering when they were registering young voters.
Wong said he was undecided whether to pay the compound fee or not as the due date for compound is on August 17. He said he would discuss the matter further State Chairman, Wong Ho Lien and Chong Chieng Jen.

石角巴罗桥失修

石角西里益中公A路尾端的巴罗桥已埙坏多年，让居住附近的村民每天都得战战兢兢的使用该木桥。行动党石角支部党员探访附近的村民之后发现该木桥自从1986年被使用至今，政府从未投入修补该桥的工作。村民们在1999年至2007年期间曾多次请求透过拿督叶金来和人联党思故邦分部执委请求当时的联邦工程部政务次长拿督杨昆贤向政府申请建造新桥以惠及当地村民。而至今却有如石沉大海，全无下文。政府不应等到意外发生时才来做补救，而是应该以人民的安全和利益为重。政府这种不负责任的态度已严重影响当地村民的日常生活，因为该桥是他们通往外界的唯一要道。
人联党每次的大选口号都离不开以政府拨款来捞取选票，但是人民却无法享有最基本的设施。巴达旺市议会主席陈如飞说议会不够拨款供兴建基本设施。我要问的是，为什么州政府却有钱兴建3亿的新立法议会大厦？
身为执政党的人联党，都无法协助自己选区的村民建造一条桥梁，真是一大讽刺。所谓人联党一向来都强调的“有人在朝好办事”，原来是虚构的。

请人联青不要再谩骂，请回答政策问题

人联党在上届州选后失去六个州议席后，曾经不断表明将进行改革。人联党所谓的改革是只见楼梯响不见人下来。这届的州议会已经过了一半的任期，还不见人联党在土地政策上有任何改变。行动党在州议会提呈土地修改法令，要将现有的不公平的土地政策修改，给人民更好的土地保障，这包括地契免费自动更新及红线两年自动解除。人联党却不敢面对人民的诉求，在动议这法案时选择逃避。也因此创造了我国有史以来第一次集体离席州议会事件。这导致了这法案“流产”。

对于这起事件人联青至今仍采取谩骂的态度，尝试丑化行动党的议员。但是州议会是讨论人民的事。人联青如果要接过未来执政的棒子，应该发表政策上的意见。因此我想请问人联青几个个关于土地政策的问题：-
1. 砂地广人稀，但是许多地主频频面对地契更新费高得惊人。请问这合理吗？
2. 如果将法令改成地契到期免费自动更新99年，这好不好？
3. 土地法典第47条文赋予州政府权利可以将土地画上红线几十年，无需真正使用或赔偿，请问这合理吗？
4. 如果将法令改成红线过了两年自动取消，这好不好？
5. 现今的政策是，土地遭政府征用，所获得赔偿是土地遭画红线时的市价。如果有地主是在红线后几十年才获得赔偿，不过又是获得几十年前市价的赔偿，这合理吗？
6. 如果将法令改成红线两年内必须宣布赔偿数额，之后的3个月内必须付还赔偿，这好不好？

砂国阵又赶行动党州议员出州议会

国阵屡次将行动党议员逐出州议会，显示政府没有决心解决人民的民怨。这届的州议会，国阵首先先对行动党州主席黄和联下禁足令长达12个月，之后将温利山州议员逐出州议会一天，现在又再次威胁以特权委员会对付张健仁州议员，这是鸵鸟心态，为了逃避面对人民的诉求。

议会殿堂讨论的是人民的事情。国阵将行动党议员逐出议会能够解决自己怨气，但是不能解决人民的怨气。行动党在州议会是批评政府的不公政策，不是为了惹议员们的怒气。黄和联在辩论附加法案，为了争取更透明的政府财政账目而被政府禁足议会一年。张健仁及温利山在提呈一个更利于人民的土地改革法典及提出治水计划而遭到对付。如今，人联党要在次将张健仁交予特权委员会，因为提出甘密街巴刹被关闭事件。

这种种的对付行动是有计划性的，目的是要逃避人民的诉求。国阵及人联党如果是以身为“父母官”的心态来参政，就不应该只顾着解决自己被人批评的怨气，而罔顾人民的怨气。

Introducing the Land Law Reform (Renewal of Terms and Documents of Titles and Acquistion) Ordinance 2009 Bill

From SarawakUpdate.com.my

Assemblyman for Sentosa, Chong Chieng Jen submitted a Notice of Motion pursuant to Standing Order 45 today, first time an opposition party has done so in DUN.

In the notice of motion made available to the press today, it stated “Whereas under the existing Section 26 of the Land Code (cap 81) upon expiration of the term secured under a document of title to land, the person claiming thereunder has no guaranteed right of renewal of the term.

And Whereas this has created great uncertainty, anxiety and concern amongst landowners throughout the State of Sarawak whose terms of documents of title will expire within the next 20 years.

And whereas the premiums imposed by the Government on renewal of terms of documents of title are excessive and many landowners find them burdensome and unaffordable.

And Whereas the provision under the Land Code (cap 81) in respect of Resumption of Alienation land are unfair, in particular, the ooperation of Section 47 thereof in the asessment of the compensation amount and the delays in the payment of compensation amount for land resumed by the government.

wherefore:
for the better protection of the rights of landowerns in the state of Sarawak. It is hereby moved that leave be granted by this house to the Member for kota Sentosa to introduce the Bill entitled “an ordinace to provide far automatic renewal of terms of documents of title to land an a fair process of compulsory acquisition of land, the assessment of compensation to be made on account of such acquistion and other matters incidental thereto”. The short title of the Bill shall be “Land Law Reform (Renewal of Terms and Documents of Titles and Acquistion) Ordinance 2009.

With the passing of t his Bill, it will solve the predicament of the landowner of Sarawak. The Bill will repeal part of the Land Code (CAp 81) in so far as relating to renewal of terms of documents of title and resumption of alienated land. the leading features of this Bill are:

1. It provides for automatic renewal of terms of documents of title to land without any payment of premium.
2. It provides that the notice issued under Section 47(1) of the Land Code (Cap 81) shall lapse and cease to be of effect on the expiry of two years after the date of the notice in so far as it related to any land or part thereof in respect of which the government has not acquired within the said period of two years and
3. It provides for prompt payment of reasonalble compensation amount for land resumed by the government.

Where are the Summons Coming From?

From SarawakUpdate.com.my



Summonse flying around cause for concern, DAP

Mechanic, Henry Goh approached the DAP for assistance yesterday which he felt he and his wife were wrongly issued summons on December 3 last year at Tunku Abdul Rahman at 8.55 pm and March 23 last year at 7.07 pm at Green Road.

Wong King Wei, Special Assistant to MP for Kuching, Chong Chieng Jen said he received the december summon recently by post and even though he was sure his wife, Lo Siew Lee (the car under her name) never go out at night, he decided to pay the summon as it was RM30.

Yesterday morning, while at the police station, he was shocked when he was told that there was another unpaid summon in March.

Goh said he decided not to pay both summons and asked the DAP for help. He said he would not know if the police would issue him more summons without his knowledge.

Wong said his legal firm had decided to help Goh and would take out the case. He said it was up to the police to prove that the car was there both times. He said he was worried that the summon could be posted with malice.

7 Summons of Jalan Court House cancelled by JPJ

From SarawakUpdate.com.my

The Road Transport department has issued a letter to Wong King Wei, Special assistant to MP for Kuching Chong Chieng Jen to allow seven car owners to have their summon cancel and instead be given a warning.

Talking to reporters yesterday, Wong said he was approached by seven car owners who had parked their vehicles along Jalan Court House on February 17 this year. The car owners were customers and business owners in the area.

Wong wrote a letter to the Director of RTD on February 18 asking the department to cancel the summon as he felt that the said road was closed for construction purposes and there was no through road in the area.

He said since the closure of the road on April 1 last year, the businessmen in the area complained that their business had dropped by 50%. Wong said due to that, even with the closed road, the RTD still wanted to issue summon to the people.

Wong said after the RTD replied, he hoped that the road would be reopened as construction work on the building had stopped for a while. He said the road belonged to the people and to close the road is not only affecting the business of the people there but also affecting the smooth flow of the traffic.

Despite him bringing the matter to the Land and Survey two weeks ago, Wong said he had yet to receive any reply from them.

Bandar Kuching Election Petition Judgment Day 10.03.2009

We won the Election Petition in Federal Court level

The Federal Court pronounced the judgment for Bandar Kuching Election Petition today in Kuching. Chong Chieng Jen won the case.

Chong described this case is a “joke” and glad that it ends finally.

SUPP had started all these. This shows that they are not respecting the mandate of the people. Chong won a handsome majority of 9,952 votes. I wondering why SUPP still has any queries of what is in Kuching people's mind. Isn't it the result in 308 tells that vividly?

What was right is right, what was wrong remains wrong. We are taking steps to lodge police report on those who have being ruled of making false sworn statements in the Court. This is to ensure that the society will move to the direction of righteousness. Wrongdoers should pay their costs for doing wrongs.

308一周年

308一周年，
民意愈来愈抬头，达至建国以来最高境界。
人民对贪污，滥权，腐败，官僚，朋党，种族主义等名词，更加了解。
这是对国阵的一个警钟，也是对民联一个督促，督促我们要做的更好。

人联党总是说火箭只说不做。
308过后，我们证明了火箭成了政府后，做的让国阵望尘莫及，就是说没得好比。
之后国阵甚至纷纷效法，特别是向槟城火箭政府学习。

虽然民意抬头，但是民主政治工作者面对的是更严峻的挑战。
我们面对更加艰巨及危险的工作环境，风险更大了。
但是我相信雨后会有彩虹，
只要民众对原则，社会公义，民主更加追求及永不妥协，
国家将有更美的未来。

有“月饼”，没“西瓜”的国阵

国阵以为有了“月饼”就万事足，就能夺回霹雳政权，
不过却没想到，没有“西瓜”是个大错。


还好我们还有“西瓜”，给国阵一个错手不及。
所谓种瓜得瓜，种“饼”让你变“猪头丙”。

现在霹雳的宪法危机，是国阵一手造成。
被人民唾弃的国阵无法在霹雳形成“政改”热潮。
霹雳变天其实不是改变，而是打回原形，打回到人民不想回到的原形。

霹雳议长对国阵大臣及行政议员的禁足令，
是为国家大义否决国阵对民主所施强暴行为。

国阵称民联恋权。这是“傻瓜”的话。
民联要求的是解散州议会，进行选举，还政于民。
是国阵恋权，不敢选举，抹杀民主，霸王硬上弓！

傻瓜形成，是因为没有政治理想、抱负的人参政。
从政者只为私利，是人民的悲哀。

西瓜，冬瓜，苦瓜，大南瓜都好，别做傻瓜。

模仿ICAC的模式，没有模仿心志

我对新的反贪污委员会对雪州州务大臣的积极调查行动感到惊讶。（阅读今日大马新闻）
对民联的部长，他们总是特别积极。
这是改革后的反贪委员会的唯一新形象。


反贪污委员会（前身是反贪污局）是2009年1月1日起进行“锐变”，
其实是名字上的改变，人事上完全没变，所以百姓“没便”。
改变没有来到反贪机制，阿都拉卸任前只不过把名字换一换。
如果反贪的决心没变，什么新的法令，新的名字，都不过是花拳绣腿。

对雪州大臣的积极态度，是好事，
因为这样能够透过法庭来寻求真相，
当然如果反贪委员会“玩臭”就不是好事。

尤其现在民联的议员及行政议员纷纷中招，
先有安华被控鸡奸，霹雳两位行政议员被控贪污（之后跳槽），
郭素沁在内安法令下被关7天，
吉打一名州议员因不堪受献议跳槽而辞职，
黄洁冰被公开裸照，
什么把戏都有。

马来西亚模仿香港的廉政公署（ICAC）的模式，没模仿心志。
反贪委员会是选择性采取行动，不顺眼者斩。
我们有“挑食”的反贪机构，国家就不健康。

日前砂反贪污委员会主席，礼貌拜会我们砂首长，
不知她有否告诉首长先生他们将采取严厉行动铲除砂州贪污滥权问题呢？

我对回教国、回教法的立场

1. 回教党在瓜拉登嘉努补选流失大量的华裔选票，是自食其果。回教党提出建立回教国议程是在“玩火”，在考验华裔选民的耐心，也在考验我党的容忍度。故此，我支持全国党主席卡巴星坚决反对建立回教国立场。

2. 我党是全国唯一反对建立回教国、坚持世俗国的政党。人联党对前首相敦马哈迪和现任副首相纳吉所提出的“回教国”，及现任首相拿督斯里阿都拉所提出的“世俗回教国”都默许，是华人执政党的一个耻辱，是最没有原则的政党。

3. 308过后我党看到人民求变的心，一心一意要粉碎国阵的霸权及贪污，于是在西马与公正党及回教党合作组成民联。催促我党参与民联主要的原因是为国、为民缔造更好的生活环境，并不表示我党因此认同盟友的每一项政治议程

4. 民联与国阵的联盟是十分不同。（一）民联不是一个组织，是一个合作关系的称号。民联没有内部宪法，因此“回教国”议程不是民联三党的共同议程。（二）民联三党的合作是互相制衡，产生三党之间合作同时的政治张力，与人联党在国阵里“寻求协商”的地位，有很大的区别。也因为三党互相依赖的合作关系，回教党不能在没有盟友的支持下，进行“回教国议程”。故此，我再次支持全国党主席卡巴星的立场：宁可不执政，也不同意建立回教国

5. 至今人民公正党仍对“回教国”议题持模拟两可的立场。吁请公正党实权领袖拿督斯里安华表明其党对“建立回教国”所持的立场，以展示在砂州与我党合作的诚意。