完整的历史，完整的事实

2011年11月18日
砂拉越州议会会议记录及被删除部份

黄庆伟：
自从过去的十至二十年，州政府拆毁了不少建在黄金地段的政府宿舍。这些黄金地被政府取来批给私人公司。其中，三个片这类的土地被2010年的总稽查司报告关注。我将讲其中的一个案件。

一片位于美里市丹戎罗班的九片土地，面积共约有90英亩或36.44公顷，于1995年被政府批给一间名叫Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司。这项批地是为了进行住宅区发展计划。

其中一个条件，就是该公司，Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.，需要兴建31间新的政府宿舍来取代被拆毁的28间旧宿舍。该公司已经于2010年7月初将这31间宿舍建成。另一个条件就是该公司必须还给州政府一笔RM2,630,000.00的费用。那就是说RM29,207.55一英亩。

丹戎罗班的黄金地段可值RM2,500,000.00一英亩，不是RM2,630,000.00零吉90英亩。如果该地段以公开招标的方式出售并且以一英亩RM2,500,000.00售出，砂州将获得RM225,113,000.00，而不是区区的RM2,630,000.00。

我尊贵的国阵议员，砂州再这单一的过程损失了RM222,483,000.00的收入。难道你们要说该公司兴建的31间新宿舍值RM222,483,000.00？

议长： 议员，你还有两分钟。

黄庆伟： 好的。难道你要说这每间宿舍值大约马币七百万？
到底是谁拥有这一间Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司？这间公司是由两间公司共同拥有，那就是Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 及Sarawak Land Sdn. Bhd.
Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 是由KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 全权拥有。
Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. 持有KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 60% 的股权。


（被删除部分)
[黄庆伟： Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd.是由首席部长的4位儿女全权拥有，每人持有10万股。他们是：
Jamilah Hamidah Taib，
Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib，

议长打岔： 议员。。。

黄庆伟继续：Hanifar Hajah Taib，
Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib。。。（被打扰）]


议长： 议员，如果你要说到首席部长，你必须要有正规动议。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议才可以，你刚才已经不断地提到首席部长。必须要有动议。你不能说着说着然后突击。我将指示议会秘书删除这冒犯言论的部分。

黄庆伟： 为什么你要删除？我在讲事实。我有很有力的证据。

议长： 因为你必须要有动议。他是这议会的首席领袖。

黄庆伟： 我是在说批地程序。我是根据那。。。（被打扰）

议长： 你不能说着说着然后突击。

黄庆伟： 没有。我在参与预算案辩论。

议长： 我现在指示你必须有动议。

黄庆伟： 我在辩论预算案。

议长： 你不能就这样说。我现在指示议会秘书。。。不。不。

黄庆伟： 这是事实。

议长： 不，不。你已经耗尽你的时间。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议。你不能就这样讲。我不允许。

黄庆伟： 为什么？为什么需要动议？
为什么就只有首席部长我们需要动议？
为什么就是当我们说到首席部长的时候需要动议？

议长： 不。你必须总结。

黄庆伟： 好，我总结。首席部长欠我们一个解释。。。（被打扰）

议长： 不，不。你总结。

黄庆伟： 好。我总结。民联的替代财政预算案比国阵的预算案更好，因为一个非常重要的原因，它是反贪污及反朋党主义。

谢谢。我就此结束。

The Full History and Full Truth

DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI SARAWAK
HANSARD DATED 18 NOVEMBER 2011
AND ITS EXPUNGED PART


Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei:

ALIENATION OF GOVERNMENT QUARTERS LAND

Since past decades of two, the State Government has destructed many of the Government quarters which were built on prime lands. All these prime lands were taken from government quarters use and alienated to private companies.

Amongst all, three cases of alienation of prime land of this kind have been highlighted in Auditor General Report 2010. I will talk about one of these cases. A piece of land located at Tanjung Lobang area Miri comprised in nine lots at the total area of about 90 acres or 36.44 hectares has been alienated to a company named Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad in year 1995. The said alienation is for the purpose of inter alia development of land into housing estate. One of the conditions of the such alienation was that the said company, Shoreline Sendirian Berhad is required to replace the 28 units of quarters with new 31 unit of quarters, which the company has completed in early July 2010. The other condition of the said alienation was the said company has to pay the State Government premium in the total sum of RM2.63 million or about RM29,207.55 per acre.

A prime land in Tanjung Lobang can easily go to RM2.5 million per acre and not RM2.63 million for about 90 acres. If the said piece of state land is to be alienated by way of open tender or open auction and if it is sold at RM2.5 million per acre, the state will be generating a total revenue of RM225.113 million and not merely RM2.63 million.

My Honorable Members from Barisan Nasional, the State has lost RM222.483 million of revenue in this single exercise. Are you going to say that the 31 quarters replaced by the company is worth RM222.483 million?

Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, you have two minutes more.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Yes. Are you going to say it costs the State Government about RM7 million per quarter? Who owns this Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad? The said companies is jointly owned by two companies in equal shares, namely Plieran Sendirian Berhad and Sarawak Land Sendirian Berhad Plieran Sendirian Berhad is wholly owned by KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad. Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. owns 60 percent of the total share in KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad.

(Expunged Part)

[Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. is owned by 4 children of Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister in equal share of 100,000 each.
Jamilah Hamidah Taib; Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib;

Tuan Speaker: (Interruption) Ahli Yang Berhormat …

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Hanifar Hajah Taib; Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib….(Interruption)]


Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, if you want to mention the Chief Minister is only on substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I will... (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It is only on substantive motion, you have been mentioning the Chief Minister all over again just now. It is only on substantive motion. You cannot speak and ambush. Speak and ambush. I will hereby direct the Secretary to expunge the offended parts.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why you want to expunge? I am saying the fact. I have the concrete fact here.

Tuan Speaker: Because you can only do on substantive motion. He is the head of this House.
Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the alienation I am talking about. I am depending on the… (interruption)

Tuan Speaker: You cannot speak and then you ambush.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: No, I am debating the budget.

Tuan Speaker: I hereby ask you to have a substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I am talking about the budget.

Tuan Speaker: You cannot just speak like this. I hereby direct the Secretary. No, no.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the fact.

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You have exhausted your time.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It must be on substantive motion. You cannot just speak like this. I will not allow.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why? Why has to be a substantive motion?
Why only Chief Minister, we have to move a motion?
Why only when we talk about Chief Minister we have to move a motion?

Tuan Speaker: No. You will conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I will conclude. Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister owes us the explanation… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I conclude. The Pakatan Rakyat Alternative Budget is more favourable, by important reason. It is against corruption and cronyism. Thank you. With that, I conclude.

夢醒時分 The moment when dream is awakened...

夢醒時分 The moment when dream is awakened...

鄭丁賢 • 夢醒時分
2009-12-02 20:49

你是否和我一樣，發覺身邊的親戚和朋友，似乎少了許多。
I wonder you feel the same as me, all the sudden I realized friends and relatives around me seems to get less and less.

以往接近過年時，各種聚餐排得滿滿的，而今年，似乎沒聲沒息。
Those years when the New Year drew near, all sorts of gathering appointments almost completely filled the diaries, but this year seems so quiet.

即使是平常日子，電話少了，與大家見面也少了。
Even in nromal time, phone calls become less and less, face to face meet up also become much less.

也許，大家各忙各的；或者，目前流行 “ 宅生活 ” ，儘量避免出門。
Perhaps, everybody is busy with their own things, or perhaps, nowadays people prefer to stay in.

也不盡然如此。再想一想，很多老友和親戚，已經不在了。嗟！大吉利是，他們都還好好的，只是離開了馬來西亞。
However, it is not entirely like this, thinking further, actually old friends and relatives are not around any more. God bless, they are still alive and well, they just left the country, Malaysia .

去了中國大陸開工廠；王子不做工程師，移民到澳洲開小食 檔；阿風離開本地大學，去香港做講師；青蛙去了台灣，開展事業第二春；還有的到了美國、英國，唔，還有去印尼的 …… 。
They have gone to China to set factory; ah Wang quit his engineer job and migrated to Australia to set up his little food store business, ah Fong left the local University went to Hong Kong as a lecturer. 'Frog' went to Taiwan to pursue his second career life. Others went to Americia , England, even Indonesia ...

起初，以為這只是個別現象，逐漸的，旁人也有同樣發現；原來，這不是個別現象，而是社會現象；這不是少數，而是相當大的數目。
At first, I thought these are individual cases, but gradually, people around me realized the same, these are not individual cases but a general symptoms of our society. they are not small numbers but the pretty big indeed.

外交部早前披露了一個數字， 說明這個現象是多麼真實，多麼貼近。
Department of Foreign Affairs released the figures earlier, it confirmed the situation is real .

從去年 3 月到今年 9 月，已經有 30 萬大馬人移民他國；其中 20 萬人是今年 1 月到 8 月出走的數目。
From March 2008 thru September 2009, a total of 300,000 Malaysian migrated to other countries, among them 200,000 left between Jan - Aug 2009. (in 8 months)

累積下來，已經有超過 200 萬大馬人移民，接近今天印尼外勞在大馬的人口。
Cummulatively, there are 2 million Malaysian migrated, this figure is close to the number of Indonesian workers in Malaysia today.

不同的是，移居他國的大馬人，多是專業人士、中 產階級。
The difference are, those migrated are mostly professional and middle class people.

他們有很多出走的理由，追求事業發展，為了孩子前途，尋找個人更大空間 …… ，概括一句：對馬來西亞失望。
They have many reasons to leave: pursue career development, for the future of their children, in search of better life and environment... In one sentence, they lost hope of Malaysia .

50 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞真好，好過香港，甚至日本。
50 years ago people said: Malaysia is very good, better than Hong Kong and even Japan .

30 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞還不錯，比得上韓國、台灣（不提香港和日本了）。
30 years ago people said: Malaysia is not bad, comparable to S. Korea and Taiwan . (No mention of Hong Kong and Japan any more).

20 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞還可以，至少超越中國、泰國（不能和台、韓比了）。
20 years ago people said: Malaysia can do la, at least better than China and Thailand (Cannot compare with Taiwan and Korea lah)

10 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞再差，還不至於像越南、 印尼（中國已是不同級別）。
10 years ago poeple said: No matter how bad Malaysia is, cannot be worse than Vietnam and Indonesia ko-ah. ( China is already in a different category).

今日，越南和印尼的經濟成長率遙遙領先大馬，社會活力和知識發展也勝過一籌；距離愈來愈近了。
Today, the economic growth rate of Vietnam and Indonesia already far exceeded Malaysia , Social activity and intellectual development of the country is also better, the gap between us and them is closing up.

怕甚麼，還有菲律賓和柬埔寨、緬甸。
Why worry? there are still Philipines , Cambodia and Myanmar behind us.

但是，一位經濟學家最近到菲律賓考察之後，認為再過 20 年，大馬可以取代菲律賓，出口馬籍女傭到全世界了。
However, according to an economist who recently surveyed Phillipines, he think in 20 years' time, Malaysia can replace Phillipines to become the World exporter of Malaysian maids.

半個世紀以來，馬來西亞是在大宅院裡，用封建方式，分配祖宗家業，消耗社會資源，浪費和逼走人才；不談競爭力，忽略生 產力，討厭績效制。
Over half the century, Malaysians live in the big old imperial housing complex, closed up and survive on properties left behind by the ancestor; continue to consume up social resources, wasteful, and drive away talents; they never talk about competitiveness, totally neglect productivity, and hate meritocracy.

亞洲金融風暴來襲時，大馬把門關起來，以為避過一劫，有人還自我陶醉，自以為是天才策略。
When Asia economic storm hit in 1997, Malaysia closed their doors, thinking we beautifully avoided a disaster, there even think of themselves as genius, being able to handle the situation so well.

然而，其它國家面對風暴，走出風暴，進行體質改革，跨 步向前，登上 另一個水平；大馬卻還在原地踏 步 。
However, just look at other countries in our neighbourhood, they stand up, face the storm, and walk out of the storm. They overhaul the system, improve the processes and march forward, they moved up to a new level. And Malaysia , still walking on the spot.

馬來西亞，該醒一醒了。

等待薛华东先生的回信

薛华东先生
砂州人民联合党
青年团团长 日期：2010年6月7日

薛先生，
事项：邀请辩论砂州土地课题

本人诚心邀请您同台辩论有关砂州土地的课题。

本人相信双方的辩论能让人民更了解砂州国阵政府及我党有关土地的立场。

砂州地广人稀，是全国人口稠密度最低的州属。因此我党坚决的立场是砂州地契年限为99年并且地契到期免费、无条件自动更新；“红线”两年后自动取消。

然而贵党所坚持的土地立场一路来都不明确，只是以砂州首席部长的立场为立场。特别是这次诗巫国会选区补选期间，首席部长所公布的新土地更新率，比贵党之前所谓“很便宜”的更新率还要低至少50%。

因此，本人认为一场您我之间的辩论会，有助于人民了解贵党与我党的土地立场，也让贵党可以清楚知道人民所选择的土地政策。

如承蒙您接受此辩论会邀请，本人欣然之至。

谢谢。



____________
黄庆伟启
民主行动党
古晋社会主义青年团秘书

Show Up... Abdul Karim

This is my letter to YB Abdul Karim:-


Date: 8th June 2010

YB Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah
Setiausaha Politik Kepada YAB Ketua Menteri Sarawak
Jabatan Ketua Menteri Sarawak
Tingkat 2 Wisma Bapa Malaysia By Fax/Hand
Petra Jaya 418551
93050 Kuching

Dear Yang Berhormat,

Re: Police Report lodged against police brutality at KM85 Jalan Kuching/Sri Aman on 4.6.2010
Complainant: Lai Chun Nyang
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer to abovenamed matter and your press statement in the article entitled “Go to the Police, not the DAP” at front page of “Borneo Post” dated 7.6.2010.

Yang Berhormat said that “From what had been reported” the Complainant “had refused to follow the instructions of the police”.

From the abovementioned article, it can be quite certain that Yang Berhormat possesses information of what was transpired at the scene. The person who informed Yang Berhormat the fact that the complainant “had refused to follow the instruction of the police” must be able to identify who were the policemen appeared at scene and involved in the alleged offence of police brutality.

For Yang Berhormat’s knowledge, the Investigation Officer is currently arranging for the identification parade to be held as the suspect of the case is still unknown to him. In the premises, I believe Yang Berhormat’s information would render assistance to the Investigation Officer in identifying the suspects of the alleged offence. In that case, the identification parade can be dispensed with and the case can be brought to book.

Therefore, as a matter of public duty, I urge Yang Berhormat to provide to the Investigation Officer, Inspector Azlan, who can be contacted at 016-8382007, the identity of the person who gave Yang Berhormat the abovementioned information.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,



______________________
Wong King Wei
Deputy Publicity Secretary
DAP Sarawak
cc. Investigation Officer, Inspector Azlan By Fax Only
874244