完整的历史，完整的事实

2011年11月18日
砂拉越州议会会议记录及被删除部份

黄庆伟：
自从过去的十至二十年，州政府拆毁了不少建在黄金地段的政府宿舍。这些黄金地被政府取来批给私人公司。其中，三个片这类的土地被2010年的总稽查司报告关注。我将讲其中的一个案件。

一片位于美里市丹戎罗班的九片土地，面积共约有90英亩或36.44公顷，于1995年被政府批给一间名叫Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司。这项批地是为了进行住宅区发展计划。

其中一个条件，就是该公司，Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.，需要兴建31间新的政府宿舍来取代被拆毁的28间旧宿舍。该公司已经于2010年7月初将这31间宿舍建成。另一个条件就是该公司必须还给州政府一笔RM2,630,000.00的费用。那就是说RM29,207.55一英亩。

丹戎罗班的黄金地段可值RM2,500,000.00一英亩，不是RM2,630,000.00零吉90英亩。如果该地段以公开招标的方式出售并且以一英亩RM2,500,000.00售出，砂州将获得RM225,113,000.00，而不是区区的RM2,630,000.00。

我尊贵的国阵议员，砂州再这单一的过程损失了RM222,483,000.00的收入。难道你们要说该公司兴建的31间新宿舍值RM222,483,000.00？

议长： 议员，你还有两分钟。

黄庆伟： 好的。难道你要说这每间宿舍值大约马币七百万？
到底是谁拥有这一间Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司？这间公司是由两间公司共同拥有，那就是Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 及Sarawak Land Sdn. Bhd.
Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 是由KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 全权拥有。
Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. 持有KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 60% 的股权。


（被删除部分)
[黄庆伟： Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd.是由首席部长的4位儿女全权拥有，每人持有10万股。他们是：
Jamilah Hamidah Taib，
Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib，

议长打岔： 议员。。。

黄庆伟继续：Hanifar Hajah Taib，
Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib。。。（被打扰）]


议长： 议员，如果你要说到首席部长，你必须要有正规动议。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议才可以，你刚才已经不断地提到首席部长。必须要有动议。你不能说着说着然后突击。我将指示议会秘书删除这冒犯言论的部分。

黄庆伟： 为什么你要删除？我在讲事实。我有很有力的证据。

议长： 因为你必须要有动议。他是这议会的首席领袖。

黄庆伟： 我是在说批地程序。我是根据那。。。（被打扰）

议长： 你不能说着说着然后突击。

黄庆伟： 没有。我在参与预算案辩论。

议长： 我现在指示你必须有动议。

黄庆伟： 我在辩论预算案。

议长： 你不能就这样说。我现在指示议会秘书。。。不。不。

黄庆伟： 这是事实。

议长： 不，不。你已经耗尽你的时间。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议。你不能就这样讲。我不允许。

黄庆伟： 为什么？为什么需要动议？
为什么就只有首席部长我们需要动议？
为什么就是当我们说到首席部长的时候需要动议？

议长： 不。你必须总结。

黄庆伟： 好，我总结。首席部长欠我们一个解释。。。（被打扰）

议长： 不，不。你总结。

黄庆伟： 好。我总结。民联的替代财政预算案比国阵的预算案更好，因为一个非常重要的原因，它是反贪污及反朋党主义。

谢谢。我就此结束。

The Full History and Full Truth

DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI SARAWAK
HANSARD DATED 18 NOVEMBER 2011
AND ITS EXPUNGED PART


Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei:

ALIENATION OF GOVERNMENT QUARTERS LAND

Since past decades of two, the State Government has destructed many of the Government quarters which were built on prime lands. All these prime lands were taken from government quarters use and alienated to private companies.

Amongst all, three cases of alienation of prime land of this kind have been highlighted in Auditor General Report 2010. I will talk about one of these cases. A piece of land located at Tanjung Lobang area Miri comprised in nine lots at the total area of about 90 acres or 36.44 hectares has been alienated to a company named Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad in year 1995. The said alienation is for the purpose of inter alia development of land into housing estate. One of the conditions of the such alienation was that the said company, Shoreline Sendirian Berhad is required to replace the 28 units of quarters with new 31 unit of quarters, which the company has completed in early July 2010. The other condition of the said alienation was the said company has to pay the State Government premium in the total sum of RM2.63 million or about RM29,207.55 per acre.

A prime land in Tanjung Lobang can easily go to RM2.5 million per acre and not RM2.63 million for about 90 acres. If the said piece of state land is to be alienated by way of open tender or open auction and if it is sold at RM2.5 million per acre, the state will be generating a total revenue of RM225.113 million and not merely RM2.63 million.

My Honorable Members from Barisan Nasional, the State has lost RM222.483 million of revenue in this single exercise. Are you going to say that the 31 quarters replaced by the company is worth RM222.483 million?

Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, you have two minutes more.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Yes. Are you going to say it costs the State Government about RM7 million per quarter? Who owns this Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad? The said companies is jointly owned by two companies in equal shares, namely Plieran Sendirian Berhad and Sarawak Land Sendirian Berhad Plieran Sendirian Berhad is wholly owned by KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad. Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. owns 60 percent of the total share in KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad.

(Expunged Part)

[Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. is owned by 4 children of Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister in equal share of 100,000 each.
Jamilah Hamidah Taib; Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib;

Tuan Speaker: (Interruption) Ahli Yang Berhormat …

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Hanifar Hajah Taib; Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib….(Interruption)]


Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, if you want to mention the Chief Minister is only on substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I will... (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It is only on substantive motion, you have been mentioning the Chief Minister all over again just now. It is only on substantive motion. You cannot speak and ambush. Speak and ambush. I will hereby direct the Secretary to expunge the offended parts.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why you want to expunge? I am saying the fact. I have the concrete fact here.

Tuan Speaker: Because you can only do on substantive motion. He is the head of this House.
Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the alienation I am talking about. I am depending on the… (interruption)

Tuan Speaker: You cannot speak and then you ambush.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: No, I am debating the budget.

Tuan Speaker: I hereby ask you to have a substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I am talking about the budget.

Tuan Speaker: You cannot just speak like this. I hereby direct the Secretary. No, no.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the fact.

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You have exhausted your time.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It must be on substantive motion. You cannot just speak like this. I will not allow.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why? Why has to be a substantive motion?
Why only Chief Minister, we have to move a motion?
Why only when we talk about Chief Minister we have to move a motion?

Tuan Speaker: No. You will conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I will conclude. Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister owes us the explanation… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I conclude. The Pakatan Rakyat Alternative Budget is more favourable, by important reason. It is against corruption and cronyism. Thank you. With that, I conclude.

夢醒時分 The moment when dream is awakened...

夢醒時分 The moment when dream is awakened...

鄭丁賢 • 夢醒時分
2009-12-02 20:49

你是否和我一樣，發覺身邊的親戚和朋友，似乎少了許多。
I wonder you feel the same as me, all the sudden I realized friends and relatives around me seems to get less and less.

以往接近過年時，各種聚餐排得滿滿的，而今年，似乎沒聲沒息。
Those years when the New Year drew near, all sorts of gathering appointments almost completely filled the diaries, but this year seems so quiet.

即使是平常日子，電話少了，與大家見面也少了。
Even in nromal time, phone calls become less and less, face to face meet up also become much less.

也許，大家各忙各的；或者，目前流行 “ 宅生活 ” ，儘量避免出門。
Perhaps, everybody is busy with their own things, or perhaps, nowadays people prefer to stay in.

也不盡然如此。再想一想，很多老友和親戚，已經不在了。嗟！大吉利是，他們都還好好的，只是離開了馬來西亞。
However, it is not entirely like this, thinking further, actually old friends and relatives are not around any more. God bless, they are still alive and well, they just left the country, Malaysia .

去了中國大陸開工廠；王子不做工程師，移民到澳洲開小食 檔；阿風離開本地大學，去香港做講師；青蛙去了台灣，開展事業第二春；還有的到了美國、英國，唔，還有去印尼的 …… 。
They have gone to China to set factory; ah Wang quit his engineer job and migrated to Australia to set up his little food store business, ah Fong left the local University went to Hong Kong as a lecturer. 'Frog' went to Taiwan to pursue his second career life. Others went to Americia , England, even Indonesia ...

起初，以為這只是個別現象，逐漸的，旁人也有同樣發現；原來，這不是個別現象，而是社會現象；這不是少數，而是相當大的數目。
At first, I thought these are individual cases, but gradually, people around me realized the same, these are not individual cases but a general symptoms of our society. they are not small numbers but the pretty big indeed.

外交部早前披露了一個數字， 說明這個現象是多麼真實，多麼貼近。
Department of Foreign Affairs released the figures earlier, it confirmed the situation is real .

從去年 3 月到今年 9 月，已經有 30 萬大馬人移民他國；其中 20 萬人是今年 1 月到 8 月出走的數目。
From March 2008 thru September 2009, a total of 300,000 Malaysian migrated to other countries, among them 200,000 left between Jan - Aug 2009. (in 8 months)

累積下來，已經有超過 200 萬大馬人移民，接近今天印尼外勞在大馬的人口。
Cummulatively, there are 2 million Malaysian migrated, this figure is close to the number of Indonesian workers in Malaysia today.

不同的是，移居他國的大馬人，多是專業人士、中 產階級。
The difference are, those migrated are mostly professional and middle class people.

他們有很多出走的理由，追求事業發展，為了孩子前途，尋找個人更大空間 …… ，概括一句：對馬來西亞失望。
They have many reasons to leave: pursue career development, for the future of their children, in search of better life and environment... In one sentence, they lost hope of Malaysia .

50 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞真好，好過香港，甚至日本。
50 years ago people said: Malaysia is very good, better than Hong Kong and even Japan .

30 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞還不錯，比得上韓國、台灣（不提香港和日本了）。
30 years ago people said: Malaysia is not bad, comparable to S. Korea and Taiwan . (No mention of Hong Kong and Japan any more).

20 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞還可以，至少超越中國、泰國（不能和台、韓比了）。
20 years ago people said: Malaysia can do la, at least better than China and Thailand (Cannot compare with Taiwan and Korea lah)

10 年前，大家 說，馬來西亞再差，還不至於像越南、 印尼（中國已是不同級別）。
10 years ago poeple said: No matter how bad Malaysia is, cannot be worse than Vietnam and Indonesia ko-ah. ( China is already in a different category).

今日，越南和印尼的經濟成長率遙遙領先大馬，社會活力和知識發展也勝過一籌；距離愈來愈近了。
Today, the economic growth rate of Vietnam and Indonesia already far exceeded Malaysia , Social activity and intellectual development of the country is also better, the gap between us and them is closing up.

怕甚麼，還有菲律賓和柬埔寨、緬甸。
Why worry? there are still Philipines , Cambodia and Myanmar behind us.

但是，一位經濟學家最近到菲律賓考察之後，認為再過 20 年，大馬可以取代菲律賓，出口馬籍女傭到全世界了。
However, according to an economist who recently surveyed Phillipines, he think in 20 years' time, Malaysia can replace Phillipines to become the World exporter of Malaysian maids.

半個世紀以來，馬來西亞是在大宅院裡，用封建方式，分配祖宗家業，消耗社會資源，浪費和逼走人才；不談競爭力，忽略生 產力，討厭績效制。
Over half the century, Malaysians live in the big old imperial housing complex, closed up and survive on properties left behind by the ancestor; continue to consume up social resources, wasteful, and drive away talents; they never talk about competitiveness, totally neglect productivity, and hate meritocracy.

亞洲金融風暴來襲時，大馬把門關起來，以為避過一劫，有人還自我陶醉，自以為是天才策略。
When Asia economic storm hit in 1997, Malaysia closed their doors, thinking we beautifully avoided a disaster, there even think of themselves as genius, being able to handle the situation so well.

然而，其它國家面對風暴，走出風暴，進行體質改革，跨 步向前，登上 另一個水平；大馬卻還在原地踏 步 。
However, just look at other countries in our neighbourhood, they stand up, face the storm, and walk out of the storm. They overhaul the system, improve the processes and march forward, they moved up to a new level. And Malaysia , still walking on the spot.

馬來西亞，該醒一醒了。

等待薛华东先生的回信

薛华东先生
砂州人民联合党
青年团团长 日期：2010年6月7日

薛先生，
事项：邀请辩论砂州土地课题

本人诚心邀请您同台辩论有关砂州土地的课题。

本人相信双方的辩论能让人民更了解砂州国阵政府及我党有关土地的立场。

砂州地广人稀，是全国人口稠密度最低的州属。因此我党坚决的立场是砂州地契年限为99年并且地契到期免费、无条件自动更新；“红线”两年后自动取消。

然而贵党所坚持的土地立场一路来都不明确，只是以砂州首席部长的立场为立场。特别是这次诗巫国会选区补选期间，首席部长所公布的新土地更新率，比贵党之前所谓“很便宜”的更新率还要低至少50%。

因此，本人认为一场您我之间的辩论会，有助于人民了解贵党与我党的土地立场，也让贵党可以清楚知道人民所选择的土地政策。

如承蒙您接受此辩论会邀请，本人欣然之至。

谢谢。



____________
黄庆伟启
民主行动党
古晋社会主义青年团秘书

Show Up... Abdul Karim

This is my letter to YB Abdul Karim:-


Date: 8th June 2010

YB Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah
Setiausaha Politik Kepada YAB Ketua Menteri Sarawak
Jabatan Ketua Menteri Sarawak
Tingkat 2 Wisma Bapa Malaysia By Fax/Hand
Petra Jaya 418551
93050 Kuching

Dear Yang Berhormat,

Re: Police Report lodged against police brutality at KM85 Jalan Kuching/Sri Aman on 4.6.2010
Complainant: Lai Chun Nyang
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
I refer to abovenamed matter and your press statement in the article entitled “Go to the Police, not the DAP” at front page of “Borneo Post” dated 7.6.2010.

Yang Berhormat said that “From what had been reported” the Complainant “had refused to follow the instructions of the police”.

From the abovementioned article, it can be quite certain that Yang Berhormat possesses information of what was transpired at the scene. The person who informed Yang Berhormat the fact that the complainant “had refused to follow the instruction of the police” must be able to identify who were the policemen appeared at scene and involved in the alleged offence of police brutality.

For Yang Berhormat’s knowledge, the Investigation Officer is currently arranging for the identification parade to be held as the suspect of the case is still unknown to him. In the premises, I believe Yang Berhormat’s information would render assistance to the Investigation Officer in identifying the suspects of the alleged offence. In that case, the identification parade can be dispensed with and the case can be brought to book.

Therefore, as a matter of public duty, I urge Yang Berhormat to provide to the Investigation Officer, Inspector Azlan, who can be contacted at 016-8382007, the identity of the person who gave Yang Berhormat the abovementioned information.

Thank you.

Yours faithfully,



______________________
Wong King Wei
Deputy Publicity Secretary
DAP Sarawak
cc. Investigation Officer, Inspector Azlan By Fax Only
874244

诗巫市议会的车辆失窃案，对警队是个耻辱

诗巫市议会的车辆失窃案，对警队是个耻辱。

大马皇家警察是个没有能力打击罪案的执法部队，警队已经失去效率，失去人民的信心。

诗巫市议会的车辆失窃，就算该市议会人员已经去警察局报案，到后来还是靠报案者用GPS寻回车辆。整个警队的效率还比一个市民还还来得差劲。这显示人民无法依赖警队来保护我们的性命和财产。

警方已经对罪案麻木。特别是偷窃，抢劫，恐吓等罪案，警察总是说他们无能为力。

如果一个警队不能捉拿罪犯归案，这警队是可有可无，是在浪费纳税人的钱来供养这些警员。

这是整个警队的心态问题，政府重来没有想过重振警队，而任凭警队继续腐败及懒散。难道这就是国阵政府所承诺的，安稳及繁荣吗？

今年3月初，古晋市民曾经见识过警方高素质地为国阵土保党大会执行任务，几乎古晋地区各个角落都有警察人员在巡逻及在交通灯叉口站岗。

对于土保党，警方就总动员工作，对于罪案，警方就束手无策。这是叫人不能接受的工作态度。

古晋民主行动党社青团提呈备忘录给警察

古晋民主行动党社青团于17.3.2010提呈备忘录给古晋警区主任，要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。以下是备忘录的内容：-

备忘录
要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗

致： 古晋警区主任
Ibupejabat Polis Daerah Kuching
Polis Diraja Malaysia
Jalan Simpang Tiga,
93300 Kuching,
Sarawak.

先生,

事项: 要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
我们, 古晋民主行动党社会主义青年团(社青团)，强烈要求警方在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。

2010年3月初，古晋市民在国阵土保党常年党员代表大会举行期间见识过警方高素质地为土保党执行任务，几乎古晋地区各个角落都有警察人员在巡逻及在交通灯叉口站岗。

因此，我们强烈要求同样的警力惠及全体古晋人民，像对待土保党一样。古晋罪案猖獗，纵然官方数字不会这样显示。最近我们有四个女学生遭匪徒攫夺财务，有一个甚至牺牲了她的性命；也有一个德士司机遭谋杀；学校之外的暴徒也进入学校内殴打学生；从没停止过的住家及商店爆窃；车辆失窃；强奸等等。古晋市被国阵政府描绘成安全的都市，然而许多古晋市民肯定不会赞成这样的形容。

我们也曾收过一些住家遭爆窃受害者的投诉，说，当他们致电警察部门投报案件的发生时，他们竟被警方要求去到最近的警察局书面投报后，警方才会派警察到案发现场调查。警方给的原因是他们不可擅自离开办公室展开案件的调查除非有正式的投报。

就因为这样，那些受害者需要等上大约两个小时来向警方投报及录取口供，之后再等上几个小时查案警员才抵达案发现场。最终，涉案的罪犯早已逃之夭夭。

但是，反观，雪兰莪州警察却可以自动自发报警，投诉民主行动党秘书长兼槟城州首席部长涉及煽动行为。

如果警方可以这样自动自发对付国阵的政敌，那就是民主行动党，为什么不能同样对待人民的公敌，那就是无法无天的匪徒？

我们要求公平及尽责的警察执法。我们要求贴近人民的警察部队。这样才能防范罪案的发生，才能使警员成为第一个到罪案现场提供支援的人员。一个很大的原因为什么罪案不断卷土重来，那就是警察往往都是在罪案发生后许久才出现。

我们发现警员对那些触犯了小小交通规则的司机及摩多骑士比较注意，例如对那些越过双白线的司机；那些没有使用免手提通用电话的司机；不合法泊车；路税或驾驶执照逾期者，等等。这些其实是交通警察，交通局执法组及市政局交通人员的主要工作，不是警察。

我们好奇的是，一个触犯了小小交通规则的司机，瞬间就经过某个地方，对于这样的人，警方往往有办法截停他们；但是一个匪徒，在某个地方待上几句钟甚至几个小时干案，对于这样的人，警方往往没有办法缉拿他们归案。

因此，我们要求警方把警力集中在打击罪犯，透过在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。而且这是香港及韩国警方一直都在进行的。

为了人民的利益着想，我们希望我们的要求能获得警方的认真考虑并且获得同意。
2010年3月17日

谨代表古晋民主行动党社青团，
（签名）

------------------------------
黄庆伟
古晋民主行动党社青团秘书

DAPSY Memorandum to Police- 17.3.2010

DAP Socialist Youth presented a memorandum to Ketua Police Daerah Kuching on 17.3.2010 to call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded places and places with high crime rate in Kuching. The following is our memorandum:-


MEMORANDUM

CALL FOR DAILY POLICEMEN PATROLLING AND STAND GUARD
AT CROWDED PLACES AND PLACES WITH HIGH CRIME RATE
IN KUCHING


To: Ketua Polis Daerah Kuching
Ibupejabat Polis Daerah Kuching
Polis Diraja Malaysia
Jalan Simpang Tiga,
93300 Kuching,
Sarawak.


Dear Sir,


Re: Call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We, Democratic Action Party Socialist Youth (DAPSY), Kuching, strongly call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching.

The people in City of Kuching have experienced a great job done by the police personnel in patrolling and stand guard at most of the traffic light junctions all over Kuching City during the Annual General Meeting of Party Persaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), Sarawak, a component and leading party of Barisan Nasional in Sarawak, on early March 2010.

As such, we strongly call for equal force from the police, as what has been provided to PBB, to the benefit of all the people in Kuching. The crimes in this city are rampant, although the official statistics may not show so. Recently, we have four students being robbed where one of them was killed, a taxi driver was murdered, outsiders went into a secondary school and blashed up a student, non-stop houses/shop breaking incidences, theft of vehicles, rape cases and others. The City of Kuching was painted by the Barisan Nasional Government as a peaceful city to which most of the people of this city will strongly disagree.

We have received complaints from some of the victims of housebreaking that when they made phone calls to your department to report the incident of housebreaking, they have been asked by policeman to lodge a written police report at the nearest police station before any police personnel can go to the crime scene. The reason given by the police was that the investigating officer has no authorities to go out from their office to carry out investigation work unless they are referred to a formal police report.

As a result of which, the victims have to wait for about 2 hours to lodge a police report and to record his statement; and wait for another few hours for an investigating officer to come to the scene for investigation. At the end of the day, the criminals are, most of the time, untraceable.

However, on the other hand, the Selangor Police can by their own initiative lodged a police report against DAP Secretary-General and Penang Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng, for sedition.

If that can be done against DAP, a political enemy of Barisan National, why it cannot be done against the criminals, the common enemy of the people?

We urge for fair and responsible enforcement from the police force. We urge the police to be more to the ground and more accessible to the people for the purpose of preventing the crime and to be the very first person comes to the crime scene when victim is calling for aid. One of the main reasons why crimes are rampantly repeating is because policemen were only arrived to the scene long after the crime has happened.

We noticed that policemen are keener to pay attention to drivers or motorcyclists for minor traffic offences, such as vehicles which cross double lines, drivers who use handphone without hands-free while driving, illegal parking, vehicles or drivers with road tax or driving licence expired, etc… These are duties supposed to be carried out by traffic policemen, enforcement team of Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalanraya (JPJ) and traffic wardens of local councils.

We are curious why, to a minor traffic offender, who passes by a particular place in seconds, the policeman is able to identify and stops him; however to a criminal, who commits a crime in a particular place for minutes and hours, the policeman is unable to arrest him.

Therefore we call for your department to concentrate your man power in fighting against criminals by daily patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching. This has been doing by the policeman in Hong Kong and South Korea.

In the interest of the People, we hope our plea herein will meet with your serious consideration and approval.


Dated this 17th day of March, 2010



On behalf of Democratic Action Party Socialist Youth, Kuching,

(signed)

------------------------------
Wong King Wei
Secretary of DAPSY
Kuching

Polis Boleh?!

On 24.9.2004,policeman seized the pocket money in total sum of RM5,980.00 from 3 suspects before put them in lockup. The money was never returned to them since Sept 2004. All these years the police kept ignoring our letters until we filed a application to Court pray for the money to be produced to Court and to be returned to the respective owners. Finally, after more than 5 years, the police brought the money to Court and returned it to the owners. They shd returned the money to the suspects when they were released 5 years back as there is no reason why the pocket money should be detained. Shdn't the police be the guardian of our safety and property?

Satu lagi Projek Cakap Barisan Nasional, 石角大桥几时扩建？

这是2009年8月8日剪报，当时杨昆贤在该报导中指张君光大桥预计在一两个月内动工。



我要质问联邦政府为何迟迟还未扩建石角张君光大桥，是否因为联邦政府国库虚空，已经没有拨款。

我今日前往石角大桥，发现该处并没有如工程部副部长拿督杨昆贤之前所承诺的已经动工。联邦政府工程部在2009年8月7日向人民承诺该石角大桥扩建工程即将在一两个月内动工，将从双车道扩建至4条车道。而且工程将会在动工后18个月后竣工。国阵政府向人民许下的诺言并没有履行。

距离去年8月所做的承诺，到如今已经快半年了，但是我们依然没有看见有任何动静。人民依然处在塞车之苦。这是其中一个例子证明国阵政府的无能。国家在国阵政府管辖下，已经十分贫穷。

贪污是我国现在许多问题的根源，如果首相有决心要彻底肃贪，国家肯定更加富有。民主行动党的槟城政府是严打贪污的州政府，可以看到该州在经济上有明显的进步。槟城政府成功让其财务转亏为盈，不但填补了2009年预算案中的4000万令吉赤字，更获得盈余7730万令吉。

国家富有，人民才会富有。国阵政府现在连建设基本设施都有问题，证明了他们没有良好施政，没有决心肃贪。

我也质疑是否石角大桥的扩建工程遭受搁置，是为了等待下次的州选到来时，再拿来成为国阵的竞选筹码？这是国阵政府一贯的肮脏伎俩。

Joke of the Year

A man came home from work and his children ran to him and called out ‘Ayah! Ayah!’
His neighbour got very upset and said to him, “Can you please tell your children not to call you ‘Ayah’?”
The man asked, “Why?”
The neighbour retorted, “Because my children call me ’Ayah’ too. They might get confused and mistake you to be their father.”
Then the man told his neighbour, are you not ashamed to say that your children do not know who their ‘Ayah’ is.
So you are saying by using the word ‘Ayah’, your children will call me ayah too without knowing who is their father?
The neighbour said yes, only my children should use the word 'Ayah'.
The man said, “Then there is something wrong in what you are teaching your children. They are not sure and do not know who their 'Ayah' is!”

SUPP never cares about banning of "Allah" word in Sarawak

News from Sarawak Update: Wong King Wei, Special Assistant to Chong Chieng Jen urged the Home Ministry to write to the churches formally to inform them that they could use “allah” in their church magazine.Wong said Deputy Chief Minister, Datuk Patinggi George Chan was wrong when he said the Allah word was never banned in Sarawak.Showing a letter of proof that besides the Catholic church, Methodist church received a letter from the Home Minister in November 26, 2008 banning them from using the word. The word was used in the Malay edition of the Methodist church.Wong said he was sad that the issue was politicised for the benefit of UMNO who wanted to win votes in West Malaysia thus the ban and allowing it to be used here as they wanted to win the votes here as there were more Christians here,Due to the issue, more than 10 churches and a mosque had been vandalised in the nation.

一个马来西亚

“一个马来西亚”是什么意思？

哲学家会说：“这是一个十分有深度的，因为它简单得又不容易明白。”

天文学家会说：“在浩瀚的宇宙，有一个太阳系，太阳系里有一个地球，地球上有一个马来西亚。”

生物学家会说：“虽然我们可以复制羊，牛，甚至人，我们不能多复制一个马来西亚。”

地理学家会说：“一个马来西亚，是在一个新加坡的北部，也是在一个泰国的南部。”

数学家会说：“对了，一个马来西亚，就是一个马来西亚，不可能会是两个”

国阵马屁精会说：“你看不出是什么吧？这就证明首相有远见。”

马来西亚百姓：“？？？”

自从首相就任，提出“一个马来西亚”口号，至今还只是一个口号。首相7月31日刚推出的“一个马来西亚”信托基金，依旧有种族固打。这是很大的讽刺，难道首相要塑造一个到处有固打制的马来西亚？要人民了解什么是“一个马来西亚”的施政方针，言行一致是必须的，单单口号是不够的。

赵明福事件已经把国阵的反贪假面具扯了下来。原来反贪污局所谓积极调查巴生港口和基尔的2,400万的豪宅是假的，怎样都不会查国阵官员像查问赵明福到三更半夜吧？与赵明福同一天被召问话的加影市议员陈文华被反贪污官员以暴力，恐吓及种族性言论辱骂。很有可能对赵明福的盘问方式也是如此。陈文华被辱骂为“一个愚蠢华人”。如果这是所谓“一个马来西亚”的施政方针，那么这口号应该改为“一个黑色马来西亚”更为恰当。

贪污是众多施政偏差的根源。新首相政府仍然没有展示扑灭贪污的决心。砂州国阵方面更是照一贯的作风，官官相护，一起“发财”。砂州政府没有实施所有政府工程公开投标的决心，继续黑箱作业，又是“一个黑色马来西亚”。

再来，根据2009年反贪污委员会法令第23条文阐明，“任何公共机构的官员，利用自己的职位或地位，获取任何利益给予自己，或亲属或朋党，都属于贪污。”如果这些作风没有铲除，也是“一个黑色马来西亚”的局面。

“一个马来西亚”到底是什么意思，至今还没有解释清楚。

当局越欺压，越多人向我们登记选民

　　诗华日报报导

行动党破纪录　美食节130选民注册

(本报古晋11日讯)砂行动党极力为市民提供“新选民登记”之服务﹐并在上周六在古晋美食节突破记录﹐收集了130份选民登记资料。
　　砂行动党国州议员张健仁之特别助理黄庆伟于今午的媒体发布会上表示﹐该党于8月8日晚上，在古晋民众会堂为市民处理选民登记﹐但却遭南市执法部向他发出一张传票﹐罪名指他在没有向市议会申请准证的情况下﹐在古晋民众会堂范围里展示“新选民登记”的告示牌﹐因而罚款马币200令吉。
　　传票内也显示﹐受罚者必需在期限内﹐即8月17日缴清有关罚款。
　　他补充﹐此项条例是根据南市(广告)条例2003年第3条文﹐若受罚者不缴交罚款，将把问题带上法庭﹐罚款最高为2000令吉或监禁6个月。
　　黄庆伟诉说当晚的情况时指出﹐当行动党党员在民众会堂进行新选民登记时﹐大约有10多名南市执法部队站立在旁约有30分钟﹐之后﹐才要求该党收起告示牌﹐否则将触犯南市的条例。

执法部队有心针对

　　他表示﹐从南市执法部队的举动可看出﹐该些官员是存心针对行动党﹐因为他们是在新选民登记处徘徊了许久后﹐才想到援引何种法令来对付行动党。
　　“而且有关南市执法部的领队，除了要求我们收起新选民登记告示外﹐还警告我，不要占他们(南市)的便宜。当时﹐我并不清楚﹐我们占了南市什么便宜？我们只是为市民进行选民登记。”
　　黄庆伟也说﹐南市于上周阻止行动党在民众会堂摆设摊口﹐而开出传单予张健仁﹐所以该党改用以举牌方式﹐但却又处处遭到阻扰。但是﹐他清楚知道的是﹐砂州国阵政府一直透过地方议会来占人民的便宜。
　　他举例说明﹐垃圾私营化就是一项很明显的例子。他续说﹐以前﹐地方议会每年只需花费50万令吉作为垃圾回收费用﹐但自垃圾私营化后﹐南市单缴付给私营化公司的开销﹐每年大约300万令吉。不仅如此﹐垃圾回收的次数不但减少﹐服务态度也变差。
　　他表示﹐缴交传单会让他心有不甘﹐在这情况下﹐他将会与该党领袖﹐以及行动党律师团成员商讨此事﹐以作出解决方案。
　　“目前﹐我未做任何决定﹐而且缴付罚款的期限也还没到。”

War over Voters Registration

From Sarawak Update

MBKS and DAP war over voters registration counter continues

Wong King Wei, Personal Assistant to MP for Kuching, Chong Chieng Jen received a summon last Saturday night from the Kuching city south for ‘exhibit depiting new voters registration without valid licence/permit from the council.
Wong said this afternoon that he was disappointed with the council’s enforcement unit’s attitude as before giving him the summon, they had stood around for half an hour deciding what to do with him and the DAP members for helping registering young voters.
The enforcement head of MBKS said, “Dont take advantage of us” before giving the summon. He said it appeared that the MBKS were adament on giving them a hard time.
Wong said it was the MBKS who had been taking advantage of the people all these while. He said before the rubbish collection was privatised, the council coolection was RM500,000 per year. After Trienken took over, he said, collection of rubbish which was only 2 times per week(previously 3 times), the payment was RM3 million per year.
He said the week before Chong also received a summon for littering when they were registering young voters.
Wong said he was undecided whether to pay the compound fee or not as the due date for compound is on August 17. He said he would discuss the matter further State Chairman, Wong Ho Lien and Chong Chieng Jen.

石角巴罗桥失修

石角西里益中公A路尾端的巴罗桥已埙坏多年，让居住附近的村民每天都得战战兢兢的使用该木桥。行动党石角支部党员探访附近的村民之后发现该木桥自从1986年被使用至今，政府从未投入修补该桥的工作。村民们在1999年至2007年期间曾多次请求透过拿督叶金来和人联党思故邦分部执委请求当时的联邦工程部政务次长拿督杨昆贤向政府申请建造新桥以惠及当地村民。而至今却有如石沉大海，全无下文。政府不应等到意外发生时才来做补救，而是应该以人民的安全和利益为重。政府这种不负责任的态度已严重影响当地村民的日常生活，因为该桥是他们通往外界的唯一要道。
人联党每次的大选口号都离不开以政府拨款来捞取选票，但是人民却无法享有最基本的设施。巴达旺市议会主席陈如飞说议会不够拨款供兴建基本设施。我要问的是，为什么州政府却有钱兴建3亿的新立法议会大厦？
身为执政党的人联党，都无法协助自己选区的村民建造一条桥梁，真是一大讽刺。所谓人联党一向来都强调的“有人在朝好办事”，原来是虚构的。

请人联青不要再谩骂，请回答政策问题

人联党在上届州选后失去六个州议席后，曾经不断表明将进行改革。人联党所谓的改革是只见楼梯响不见人下来。这届的州议会已经过了一半的任期，还不见人联党在土地政策上有任何改变。行动党在州议会提呈土地修改法令，要将现有的不公平的土地政策修改，给人民更好的土地保障，这包括地契免费自动更新及红线两年自动解除。人联党却不敢面对人民的诉求，在动议这法案时选择逃避。也因此创造了我国有史以来第一次集体离席州议会事件。这导致了这法案“流产”。

对于这起事件人联青至今仍采取谩骂的态度，尝试丑化行动党的议员。但是州议会是讨论人民的事。人联青如果要接过未来执政的棒子，应该发表政策上的意见。因此我想请问人联青几个个关于土地政策的问题：-
1. 砂地广人稀，但是许多地主频频面对地契更新费高得惊人。请问这合理吗？
2. 如果将法令改成地契到期免费自动更新99年，这好不好？
3. 土地法典第47条文赋予州政府权利可以将土地画上红线几十年，无需真正使用或赔偿，请问这合理吗？
4. 如果将法令改成红线过了两年自动取消，这好不好？
5. 现今的政策是，土地遭政府征用，所获得赔偿是土地遭画红线时的市价。如果有地主是在红线后几十年才获得赔偿，不过又是获得几十年前市价的赔偿，这合理吗？
6. 如果将法令改成红线两年内必须宣布赔偿数额，之后的3个月内必须付还赔偿，这好不好？

砂国阵又赶行动党州议员出州议会

国阵屡次将行动党议员逐出州议会，显示政府没有决心解决人民的民怨。这届的州议会，国阵首先先对行动党州主席黄和联下禁足令长达12个月，之后将温利山州议员逐出州议会一天，现在又再次威胁以特权委员会对付张健仁州议员，这是鸵鸟心态，为了逃避面对人民的诉求。

议会殿堂讨论的是人民的事情。国阵将行动党议员逐出议会能够解决自己怨气，但是不能解决人民的怨气。行动党在州议会是批评政府的不公政策，不是为了惹议员们的怒气。黄和联在辩论附加法案，为了争取更透明的政府财政账目而被政府禁足议会一年。张健仁及温利山在提呈一个更利于人民的土地改革法典及提出治水计划而遭到对付。如今，人联党要在次将张健仁交予特权委员会，因为提出甘密街巴刹被关闭事件。

这种种的对付行动是有计划性的，目的是要逃避人民的诉求。国阵及人联党如果是以身为“父母官”的心态来参政，就不应该只顾着解决自己被人批评的怨气，而罔顾人民的怨气。

Introducing the Land Law Reform (Renewal of Terms and Documents of Titles and Acquistion) Ordinance 2009 Bill

From SarawakUpdate.com.my

Assemblyman for Sentosa, Chong Chieng Jen submitted a Notice of Motion pursuant to Standing Order 45 today, first time an opposition party has done so in DUN.

In the notice of motion made available to the press today, it stated “Whereas under the existing Section 26 of the Land Code (cap 81) upon expiration of the term secured under a document of title to land, the person claiming thereunder has no guaranteed right of renewal of the term.

And Whereas this has created great uncertainty, anxiety and concern amongst landowners throughout the State of Sarawak whose terms of documents of title will expire within the next 20 years.

And whereas the premiums imposed by the Government on renewal of terms of documents of title are excessive and many landowners find them burdensome and unaffordable.

And Whereas the provision under the Land Code (cap 81) in respect of Resumption of Alienation land are unfair, in particular, the ooperation of Section 47 thereof in the asessment of the compensation amount and the delays in the payment of compensation amount for land resumed by the government.

wherefore:
for the better protection of the rights of landowerns in the state of Sarawak. It is hereby moved that leave be granted by this house to the Member for kota Sentosa to introduce the Bill entitled “an ordinace to provide far automatic renewal of terms of documents of title to land an a fair process of compulsory acquisition of land, the assessment of compensation to be made on account of such acquistion and other matters incidental thereto”. The short title of the Bill shall be “Land Law Reform (Renewal of Terms and Documents of Titles and Acquistion) Ordinance 2009.

With the passing of t his Bill, it will solve the predicament of the landowner of Sarawak. The Bill will repeal part of the Land Code (CAp 81) in so far as relating to renewal of terms of documents of title and resumption of alienated land. the leading features of this Bill are:

1. It provides for automatic renewal of terms of documents of title to land without any payment of premium.
2. It provides that the notice issued under Section 47(1) of the Land Code (Cap 81) shall lapse and cease to be of effect on the expiry of two years after the date of the notice in so far as it related to any land or part thereof in respect of which the government has not acquired within the said period of two years and
3. It provides for prompt payment of reasonalble compensation amount for land resumed by the government.

Where are the Summons Coming From?

From SarawakUpdate.com.my



Summonse flying around cause for concern, DAP

Mechanic, Henry Goh approached the DAP for assistance yesterday which he felt he and his wife were wrongly issued summons on December 3 last year at Tunku Abdul Rahman at 8.55 pm and March 23 last year at 7.07 pm at Green Road.

Wong King Wei, Special Assistant to MP for Kuching, Chong Chieng Jen said he received the december summon recently by post and even though he was sure his wife, Lo Siew Lee (the car under her name) never go out at night, he decided to pay the summon as it was RM30.

Yesterday morning, while at the police station, he was shocked when he was told that there was another unpaid summon in March.

Goh said he decided not to pay both summons and asked the DAP for help. He said he would not know if the police would issue him more summons without his knowledge.

Wong said his legal firm had decided to help Goh and would take out the case. He said it was up to the police to prove that the car was there both times. He said he was worried that the summon could be posted with malice.