完整的历史，完整的事实

2011年11月18日
砂拉越州议会会议记录及被删除部份

黄庆伟：
自从过去的十至二十年，州政府拆毁了不少建在黄金地段的政府宿舍。这些黄金地被政府取来批给私人公司。其中，三个片这类的土地被2010年的总稽查司报告关注。我将讲其中的一个案件。

一片位于美里市丹戎罗班的九片土地，面积共约有90英亩或36.44公顷，于1995年被政府批给一间名叫Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司。这项批地是为了进行住宅区发展计划。

其中一个条件，就是该公司，Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.，需要兴建31间新的政府宿舍来取代被拆毁的28间旧宿舍。该公司已经于2010年7月初将这31间宿舍建成。另一个条件就是该公司必须还给州政府一笔RM2,630,000.00的费用。那就是说RM29,207.55一英亩。

丹戎罗班的黄金地段可值RM2,500,000.00一英亩，不是RM2,630,000.00零吉90英亩。如果该地段以公开招标的方式出售并且以一英亩RM2,500,000.00售出，砂州将获得RM225,113,000.00，而不是区区的RM2,630,000.00。

我尊贵的国阵议员，砂州再这单一的过程损失了RM222,483,000.00的收入。难道你们要说该公司兴建的31间新宿舍值RM222,483,000.00？

议长： 议员，你还有两分钟。

黄庆伟： 好的。难道你要说这每间宿舍值大约马币七百万？
到底是谁拥有这一间Shoreline Development Sdn. Bhd.的公司？这间公司是由两间公司共同拥有，那就是Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 及Sarawak Land Sdn. Bhd.
Plieran Sdn. Bhd. 是由KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 全权拥有。
Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. 持有KBE (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. 60% 的股权。


（被删除部分)
[黄庆伟： Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd.是由首席部长的4位儿女全权拥有，每人持有10万股。他们是：
Jamilah Hamidah Taib，
Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib，

议长打岔： 议员。。。

黄庆伟继续：Hanifar Hajah Taib，
Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib。。。（被打扰）]


议长： 议员，如果你要说到首席部长，你必须要有正规动议。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议才可以，你刚才已经不断地提到首席部长。必须要有动议。你不能说着说着然后突击。我将指示议会秘书删除这冒犯言论的部分。

黄庆伟： 为什么你要删除？我在讲事实。我有很有力的证据。

议长： 因为你必须要有动议。他是这议会的首席领袖。

黄庆伟： 我是在说批地程序。我是根据那。。。（被打扰）

议长： 你不能说着说着然后突击。

黄庆伟： 没有。我在参与预算案辩论。

议长： 我现在指示你必须有动议。

黄庆伟： 我在辩论预算案。

议长： 你不能就这样说。我现在指示议会秘书。。。不。不。

黄庆伟： 这是事实。

议长： 不，不。你已经耗尽你的时间。

黄庆伟： 我。。。（被打扰）

议长： 必须要有动议。你不能就这样讲。我不允许。

黄庆伟： 为什么？为什么需要动议？
为什么就只有首席部长我们需要动议？
为什么就是当我们说到首席部长的时候需要动议？

议长： 不。你必须总结。

黄庆伟： 好，我总结。首席部长欠我们一个解释。。。（被打扰）

议长： 不，不。你总结。

黄庆伟： 好。我总结。民联的替代财政预算案比国阵的预算案更好，因为一个非常重要的原因，它是反贪污及反朋党主义。

谢谢。我就此结束。

The Full History and Full Truth

DEWAN UNDANGAN NEGERI SARAWAK
HANSARD DATED 18 NOVEMBER 2011
AND ITS EXPUNGED PART


Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei:

ALIENATION OF GOVERNMENT QUARTERS LAND

Since past decades of two, the State Government has destructed many of the Government quarters which were built on prime lands. All these prime lands were taken from government quarters use and alienated to private companies.

Amongst all, three cases of alienation of prime land of this kind have been highlighted in Auditor General Report 2010. I will talk about one of these cases. A piece of land located at Tanjung Lobang area Miri comprised in nine lots at the total area of about 90 acres or 36.44 hectares has been alienated to a company named Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad in year 1995. The said alienation is for the purpose of inter alia development of land into housing estate. One of the conditions of the such alienation was that the said company, Shoreline Sendirian Berhad is required to replace the 28 units of quarters with new 31 unit of quarters, which the company has completed in early July 2010. The other condition of the said alienation was the said company has to pay the State Government premium in the total sum of RM2.63 million or about RM29,207.55 per acre.

A prime land in Tanjung Lobang can easily go to RM2.5 million per acre and not RM2.63 million for about 90 acres. If the said piece of state land is to be alienated by way of open tender or open auction and if it is sold at RM2.5 million per acre, the state will be generating a total revenue of RM225.113 million and not merely RM2.63 million.

My Honorable Members from Barisan Nasional, the State has lost RM222.483 million of revenue in this single exercise. Are you going to say that the 31 quarters replaced by the company is worth RM222.483 million?

Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, you have two minutes more.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Yes. Are you going to say it costs the State Government about RM7 million per quarter? Who owns this Shoreline Development Sendirian Berhad? The said companies is jointly owned by two companies in equal shares, namely Plieran Sendirian Berhad and Sarawak Land Sendirian Berhad Plieran Sendirian Berhad is wholly owned by KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad. Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. owns 60 percent of the total share in KBE (Malaysia) Sendirian Berhad.

(Expunged Part)

[Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Daya Syukra Sdn. Bhd. is owned by 4 children of Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister in equal share of 100,000 each.
Jamilah Hamidah Taib; Mahmud Abu Bekir Taib;

Tuan Speaker: (Interruption) Ahli Yang Berhormat …

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Hanifar Hajah Taib; Sulaiman Abdul Rahman Bin Abdul Taib….(Interruption)]


Tuan Speaker: Ahli Yang Berhormat, if you want to mention the Chief Minister is only on substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I will... (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It is only on substantive motion, you have been mentioning the Chief Minister all over again just now. It is only on substantive motion. You cannot speak and ambush. Speak and ambush. I will hereby direct the Secretary to expunge the offended parts.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why you want to expunge? I am saying the fact. I have the concrete fact here.

Tuan Speaker: Because you can only do on substantive motion. He is the head of this House.
Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the alienation I am talking about. I am depending on the… (interruption)

Tuan Speaker: You cannot speak and then you ambush.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: No, I am debating the budget.

Tuan Speaker: I hereby ask you to have a substantive motion.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I am talking about the budget.

Tuan Speaker: You cannot just speak like this. I hereby direct the Secretary. No, no.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: This is the fact.

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You have exhausted your time.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: I… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: It must be on substantive motion. You cannot just speak like this. I will not allow.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Why? Why has to be a substantive motion?
Why only Chief Minister, we have to move a motion?
Why only when we talk about Chief Minister we have to move a motion?

Tuan Speaker: No. You will conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I will conclude. Yang Amat Berhormat Chief Minister owes us the explanation… (Interruption)

Tuan Speaker: No, no. You conclude.

Y.B. Encik Wong King Wei: Okay, I conclude. The Pakatan Rakyat Alternative Budget is more favourable, by important reason. It is against corruption and cronyism. Thank you. With that, I conclude.