Friday, March 19, 2010

古晋民主行动党社青团提呈备忘录给警察

古晋民主行动党社青团于17.3.2010提呈备忘录给古晋警区主任,要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。以下是备忘录的内容:-

备忘录
要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗

致: 古晋警区主任
Ibupejabat Polis Daerah Kuching
Polis Diraja Malaysia
Jalan Simpang Tiga,
93300 Kuching,
Sarawak.

先生,

事项: 要求警察在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
我们, 古晋民主行动党社会主义青年团(社青团),强烈要求警方在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。

2010年3月初,古晋市民在国阵土保党常年党员代表大会举行期间见识过警方高素质地为土保党执行任务,几乎古晋地区各个角落都有警察人员在巡逻及在交通灯叉口站岗。

因此,我们强烈要求同样的警力惠及全体古晋人民,像对待土保党一样。古晋罪案猖獗,纵然官方数字不会这样显示。最近我们有四个女学生遭匪徒攫夺财务,有一个甚至牺牲了她的性命;也有一个德士司机遭谋杀;学校之外的暴徒也进入学校内殴打学生;从没停止过的住家及商店爆窃;车辆失窃;强奸等等。古晋市被国阵政府描绘成安全的都市,然而许多古晋市民肯定不会赞成这样的形容。

我们也曾收过一些住家遭爆窃受害者的投诉,说,当他们致电警察部门投报案件的发生时,他们竟被警方要求去到最近的警察局书面投报后,警方才会派警察到案发现场调查。警方给的原因是他们不可擅自离开办公室展开案件的调查除非有正式的投报。

就因为这样,那些受害者需要等上大约两个小时来向警方投报及录取口供,之后再等上几个小时查案警员才抵达案发现场。最终,涉案的罪犯早已逃之夭夭。

但是,反观,雪兰莪州警察却可以自动自发报警,投诉民主行动党秘书长兼槟城州首席部长涉及煽动行为。

如果警方可以这样自动自发对付国阵的政敌,那就是民主行动党,为什么不能同样对待人民的公敌,那就是无法无天的匪徒?

我们要求公平及尽责的警察执法。我们要求贴近人民的警察部队。这样才能防范罪案的发生,才能使警员成为第一个到罪案现场提供支援的人员。一个很大的原因为什么罪案不断卷土重来,那就是警察往往都是在罪案发生后许久才出现。

我们发现警员对那些触犯了小小交通规则的司机及摩多骑士比较注意,例如对那些越过双白线的司机;那些没有使用免手提通用电话的司机;不合法泊车;路税或驾驶执照逾期者,等等。这些其实是交通警察,交通局执法组及市政局交通人员的主要工作,不是警察。

我们好奇的是,一个触犯了小小交通规则的司机,瞬间就经过某个地方,对于这样的人,警方往往有办法截停他们;但是一个匪徒,在某个地方待上几句钟甚至几个小时干案,对于这样的人,警方往往没有办法缉拿他们归案。

因此,我们要求警方把警力集中在打击罪犯,透过在古晋人潮多及罪案率高的地区每日巡逻及站岗。而且这是香港及韩国警方一直都在进行的。

为了人民的利益着想,我们希望我们的要求能获得警方的认真考虑并且获得同意。
2010年3月17日

谨代表古晋民主行动党社青团,
(签名)

------------------------------
黄庆伟
古晋民主行动党社青团秘书

DAPSY Memorandum to Police- 17.3.2010

DAP Socialist Youth presented a memorandum to Ketua Police Daerah Kuching on 17.3.2010 to call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded places and places with high crime rate in Kuching. The following is our memorandum:-


MEMORANDUM

CALL FOR DAILY POLICEMEN PATROLLING AND STAND GUARD
AT CROWDED PLACES AND PLACES WITH HIGH CRIME RATE
IN KUCHING


To: Ketua Polis Daerah Kuching
Ibupejabat Polis Daerah Kuching
Polis Diraja Malaysia
Jalan Simpang Tiga,
93300 Kuching,
Sarawak.


Dear Sir,


Re: Call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We, Democratic Action Party Socialist Youth (DAPSY), Kuching, strongly call for daily policemen patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching.

The people in City of Kuching have experienced a great job done by the police personnel in patrolling and stand guard at most of the traffic light junctions all over Kuching City during the Annual General Meeting of Party Persaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB), Sarawak, a component and leading party of Barisan Nasional in Sarawak, on early March 2010.

As such, we strongly call for equal force from the police, as what has been provided to PBB, to the benefit of all the people in Kuching. The crimes in this city are rampant, although the official statistics may not show so. Recently, we have four students being robbed where one of them was killed, a taxi driver was murdered, outsiders went into a secondary school and blashed up a student, non-stop houses/shop breaking incidences, theft of vehicles, rape cases and others. The City of Kuching was painted by the Barisan Nasional Government as a peaceful city to which most of the people of this city will strongly disagree.

We have received complaints from some of the victims of housebreaking that when they made phone calls to your department to report the incident of housebreaking, they have been asked by policeman to lodge a written police report at the nearest police station before any police personnel can go to the crime scene. The reason given by the police was that the investigating officer has no authorities to go out from their office to carry out investigation work unless they are referred to a formal police report.

As a result of which, the victims have to wait for about 2 hours to lodge a police report and to record his statement; and wait for another few hours for an investigating officer to come to the scene for investigation. At the end of the day, the criminals are, most of the time, untraceable.

However, on the other hand, the Selangor Police can by their own initiative lodged a police report against DAP Secretary-General and Penang Chief Minister, Lim Guan Eng, for sedition.

If that can be done against DAP, a political enemy of Barisan National, why it cannot be done against the criminals, the common enemy of the people?

We urge for fair and responsible enforcement from the police force. We urge the police to be more to the ground and more accessible to the people for the purpose of preventing the crime and to be the very first person comes to the crime scene when victim is calling for aid. One of the main reasons why crimes are rampantly repeating is because policemen were only arrived to the scene long after the crime has happened.

We noticed that policemen are keener to pay attention to drivers or motorcyclists for minor traffic offences, such as vehicles which cross double lines, drivers who use handphone without hands-free while driving, illegal parking, vehicles or drivers with road tax or driving licence expired, etc… These are duties supposed to be carried out by traffic policemen, enforcement team of Jabatan Pengangkutan Jalanraya (JPJ) and traffic wardens of local councils.

We are curious why, to a minor traffic offender, who passes by a particular place in seconds, the policeman is able to identify and stops him; however to a criminal, who commits a crime in a particular place for minutes and hours, the policeman is unable to arrest him.

Therefore we call for your department to concentrate your man power in fighting against criminals by daily patrolling and stand guard at crowded place and places with high crime rate in Kuching. This has been doing by the policeman in Hong Kong and South Korea.

In the interest of the People, we hope our plea herein will meet with your serious consideration and approval.


Dated this 17th day of March, 2010



On behalf of Democratic Action Party Socialist Youth, Kuching,

(signed)

------------------------------
Wong King Wei
Secretary of DAPSY
Kuching

Friday, January 29, 2010

Polis Boleh?!

On 24.9.2004,policeman seized the pocket money in total sum of RM5,980.00 from 3 suspects before put them in lockup. The money was never returned to them since Sept 2004. All these years the police kept ignoring our letters until we filed a application to Court pray for the money to be produced to Court and to be returned to the respective owners. Finally, after more than 5 years, the police brought the money to Court and returned it to the owners. They shd returned the money to the suspects when they were released 5 years back as there is no reason why the pocket money should be detained. Shdn't the police be the guardian of our safety and property?

Tuesday, January 26, 2010

Satu lagi Projek Cakap Barisan Nasional, 石角大桥几时扩建?



这是2009年8月8日剪报,当时杨昆贤在该报导中指张君光大桥预计在一两个月内动工。



我要质问联邦政府为何迟迟还未扩建石角张君光大桥,是否因为联邦政府国库虚空,已经没有拨款。

我今日前往石角大桥,发现该处并没有如工程部副部长拿督杨昆贤之前所承诺的已经动工。联邦政府工程部在2009年8月7日向人民承诺该石角大桥扩建工程即将在一两个月内动工,将从双车道扩建至4条车道。而且工程将会在动工后18个月后竣工。国阵政府向人民许下的诺言并没有履行。

距离去年8月所做的承诺,到如今已经快半年了,但是我们依然没有看见有任何动静。人民依然处在塞车之苦。这是其中一个例子证明国阵政府的无能。国家在国阵政府管辖下,已经十分贫穷。

贪污是我国现在许多问题的根源,如果首相有决心要彻底肃贪,国家肯定更加富有。民主行动党的槟城政府是严打贪污的州政府,可以看到该州在经济上有明显的进步。槟城政府成功让其财务转亏为盈,不但填补了2009年预算案中的4000万令吉赤字,更获得盈余7730万令吉。

国家富有,人民才会富有。国阵政府现在连建设基本设施都有问题,证明了他们没有良好施政,没有决心肃贪。

我也质疑是否石角大桥的扩建工程遭受搁置,是为了等待下次的州选到来时,再拿来成为国阵的竞选筹码?这是国阵政府一贯的肮脏伎俩。

Joke of the Year

A man came home from work and his children ran to him and called out ‘Ayah! Ayah!’
His neighbour got very upset and said to him, “Can you please tell your children not to call you ‘Ayah’?”
The man asked, “Why?”
The neighbour retorted, “Because my children call me ’Ayah’ too. They might get confused and mistake you to be their father.”
Then the man told his neighbour, are you not ashamed to say that your children do not know who their ‘Ayah’ is.
So you are saying by using the word ‘Ayah’, your children will call me ayah too without knowing who is their father?
The neighbour said yes, only my children should use the word 'Ayah'.
The man said, “Then there is something wrong in what you are teaching your children. They are not sure and do not know who their 'Ayah' is!”